Bitcasino.io — what was read
Exit Card 4 out of 10One of 3 entries that give the verification threshold as an actual amount — €2,500 or the equivalent in crypto. The cashier would not open from this desk, so the coin list stays empty rather than guessed.
| Row | What was read |
|---|---|
| Source of the licence number | the regulator's register |
| Regulator | Curaçao Gaming Authority |
| Licence number | OGL/2023/111/0069 |
| Status of the entry | Active |
| Company in the entry | Moon Technologies B.V. |
| Coins in the cashier | cashier not opened |
| Verification clause | clause 6.6 |
| Welcome bonus | not read |
| Wagering from 500 zł | cannot be calculated |
| Date of reading | not read |
An empty row means “not read”. It does not mean “does not exist”.
The verification clause
Clause 6.6: verification follows from €2,500 or the equivalent in crypto.
There is an actual figure inside the clause — a threshold or a deadline — and that is the kind of wording anyone can hold an operator to. In this register 3 of 40 entries have one.
What follows from it
4 points out of 10 says how much of the road out is written down before a deposit — not how the play feels here. This brand's licence number can be checked in the regulator's own search, so if something is disputed there is an address to write to.
What explains the figures on this card
- Three levels of clause — why a figure inside a clause of the terms counts for more than its tone.
- Deposits from a Polish account — six rails and the direction of each one.
- A withdrawal step by step — where a document turns up along the road.
- Method — how the five fields of this card are counted.
Neighbouring entries in the register
Four cards with a similar count of fields read. Comparing two neighbours shows exactly what a single point of difference consists of.
Further in the register